Thursday, December 26, 2013

Recipe if the day-Vegan Hot Cocoa

I've always loved hot cocoa, especially as a kid. When I gave up milk I thought my hot cocoa days were over. But I found this great recipe from Littleveganeats.com I made mine with coconut milk instead because thats what we use around here. But it tastes pretty dang good.

Quick 'n' Easy Vegan Hot Cocoa
servings: 2
What You'll Need:
2 cups soy (or almond) milk*
2 tbsp cocoa powder
2 tbsp sugar**
1/4 tsp vanilla extract
Vegan whipped topping of choice (optional)

What You'll Need to Do:
Add soymilk to a small saucepan and heat over medium heat, stirring frequently with a small whisk (this will help you get maximum frothiness), until desired heat is reached. Once milk is heated through, add vanilla, sugar and chocolate, stirring continually until fully dissolved. Remove from heat, pour into mugs, and serve immediately!

Tips and Tricks
You may want to increase the amount of cocoa and sugar (by about 1tsp or so) if you prefer a richer flavor.

Vaccine lies: Whooping cough outbreaks being triggered by vaccinated children

(NaturalNews) It is a common myth perpetuated by both the entrenched system of monopolistic medicine and the mainstream media that unvaccinated children are the social scourge responsible for triggering outbreaks of rare diseases like pertussis (whooping cough), measles and shingles. But the scientific literature suggests otherwise, showing in many cases that vaccinated children are the ones largely responsible for triggering and spreading disease.

A recent study published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences for instance, found that, despite more than 50 years of population-wide vaccination, cases of whooping cough are on the rise. The culprit? Antigens of Bordetella pertussis that not only are completely ineffective at preventing infection with Bordetella parapertussis, a whooping cough bacterium similar to B. pertussis, but actually promote it by interfering with the body's natural infection clearance protocols.

"[W]e show that aP [whooping cough] vaccination impedes host immunity against B. parapertussis-measured as reduced lung inflammatory and neutrophil responses," wrote the authors. "[W]e conclude that aP vaccination interferes with the optimal clearance of B. parapertussis and enhances the performance of this pathogen. Our data raise the possibility that widespread aP vaccination can create hosts more susceptible to B. parapertussis infection."

In other words, children who are vaccinated for whooping cough actually suffer from decreased immunity and are more susceptible to B. parapertussis infection than their unvaccinated peers. Vaccinated children, in essence, are the carriers of disease when it comes to all these whooping cough outbreaks, infecting other mostly vaccinated children and putting massive strain on local healthcare resources.

Oddly enough, it is the unvaccinated children that remain largely healthy during these outbreaks, as their immune systems are not crippled by exposure to artificial vaccine antigens. This was definitely the case as far as http://www.naturalnews.com, where more than 600 confirmed cases of whooping cough, a 10-fold increase over previous years, was documented. As you may recall, most of those infected with the disease had already been vaccinated for it.

More recently, a study funded by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) verified that the whooping cough vaccine, which is also contained in the combination DTaP injection, does not even prevent the spread of whooping cough as commonly claimed. On the contrary, the vaccine allowed the disease to fester inside the bodies of test baboons for up to five weeks, debunking a widely believed myth.

"[These findings] could explain the increase in pertussis that we're seeing in the U.S.," admitted FDA researcher Tod Merkel, affirming what many are now suggesting about the dangers of the whooping cough vaccine.

Should parents who vaccinate their children be held liable for spreading disease?

What all this suggests, of course, is that the ongoing demonization of parents who refuse to vaccinate their children is completely misdirected. If it is public health that we are all concerned about in the vaccine debate, then it appears as though parents who choose to vaccinate are the ones about who we all need to be concerned.

Perhaps the time is ripe to set the record straight and put blame where it is truly due. The tables have turned, and based on the latest available science, it is now abundantly clear that parents who vaccinate are the ones putting everyone else's children at risk.

Will the pro-vaccine lobby, which is all too quick to demand that non-vaccinating parents be held liable for putting others at risk, now be held to the same standard?


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/043330_vaccines_whooping_cough_disease_outbreaks.html#ixzz2obKKgwn6

Friday, December 20, 2013

Recipe of the day- Coconut Cookie Bars

My Dad used to make these all the time. They were my favorite, once I became vegan I thought I would never eat these again. They called for condensed milk and lots of milk chocolate. But guess what I found a vegan version! I was so excited to find this recipe and I can't wait to try it out. It calls for a few different ingredients then the one I grew up with, but I'm sure it will be just as good.

Recipe from PostPunkKitchen. I love her blog!


These bars require a good overnight chilling to really firm them up before slicing, so plan accordingly.
Tip: You’ll want to use only sweetened, fluffy white flaked coconut for these. Save the natural shredded stuff for a healthy curry.
Tip: Press the graham cracker crumb crust like crazy into the pan; the more you pat it down the firmer the resulting crust will be.
One 14 oz can (regular or lite) coconut milk (about 1 3/4 cups)
2/3 cup dark brown sugar
2 cups vegan graham cracker crumbs
1/2 cup melted margarine
2 tablespoons sugar
1 1/2 cups chocolate chips or chocolate chunks
2 cups flaked, sweetened coconut
1 cup walnuts or pecans, chopped
In a large saucepan whisk together coconut milk and brown sugar over medium high heat. Bring to a boil, reduce heat to low and simmer for 10 minutes, stirring occasionally. Mixture may form a thin skin on the surface; just stir it back into the liquid. Remove from heat and let cool while preparing the crust.
Preheat oven to 350°F. Line a 13 x 9 x 2 inch baking pan with parchment paper. In a large bowl combine graham cracker crumbs, melted margarine and sugar; mix well to moisten crumbs completely. Firmly press mixture into prepared pan, pressing evenly from center to sides of pan.
Pour warm coconut milk mixture evenly over crumb base. Top with an even layer of chocolate chips, flaked coconut and nuts, in that order. Firmly pat everything down until coconut milk mixture soaks upward into the toppings. Bake for 28-30 minutes or until coconut is deeply golden and filling is bubbling, remove from oven and let entire pan cool on a wire rack for 15 minutes. Transfer pan to the refrigerator to completely cool and firm up for at least 4 hours, even better overnight or until very firm. Use a sharp, heavy knife to run along the edges of bars, slide bars on parchment paper out of pan onto a cutting board then to slice into 24 squares. Store in a covered container in the refrigerator. These also freeze well, tightly wrapped and allowed to thaw for 20 minutes before serving.

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Timeline: What Happens After Drinking a Coca-Cola Soda

Even if you like soft drinks, you can tell by the taste that they are a potion of chemicals and man-made toxins. They don’t taste like anything natural, besides maybe sugar. And unfortunately, diet soda is no sound alternative. So what really happens after you drink a Coca-Cola or a similar soft drink?
Here is what could happen in your body after you drink a can of soda. In the first 10 minutes, it stops you from gagging on the 10 teaspoons of sugar by buffering the sweet stuff with phosphoric acid. Twenty minutes after consumption, your blood sugar levels jump alarmingly.
But the effects of your soda don’t stop there—with changes like increased blood pressure, blocked adenosine receptors (leading to that caffeine high), and increased dopamine production (think heroin). Further, calcium, zinc, and magnesium are depleted from the body.
One of the most prominent ingredients in soda is something called orthophosphoric acid—a compound that must be transported with specially designed cisterns due to its high acidity. The reservoirs are designed to withstand the effects of “highly corrosive materials”, and with each swig of Coke, you are putting this stuff in your body.
As our own Christina Sarich reports, this isn’t the only scary ingredient in a can of soda. Coloring E150D, for example, is made of processed sugar and ammonium sulfate—a chemical also found in Monsanto’s best-selling herbicide RoundUp and known to increase the symptoms of asthma. Another ingredient E950, also known as Acesulfame Potassium, “aggravates the heart, vascular system, and nervous system.” Other harmful ingredients include citric acid, sodium benzoate, and more.
Lest you think diet soda is any better, diet sodas contain aspartame, a genetically modified component with numerous health risks. Diet soda has been linked to increased risk of kidney problems, altered metabolism leading to heart attack and stroke, obesity, cell damage, and even depression.
Soft drink makers don’t have your health in mind when they create their beverages—even when they create those with “all the taste and none of the calories.” Their primary concern is making money. As a consumer, it’s your job to make health decisions and abandon soda for the benefits of healing beverages like natural vegetable and fruit juices, teas, and filtered water.


Read more: http://naturalsociety.com/effects-daily-coca-cola-soft-drink/#ixzz2nkePgrJM
Follow us: @naturalsociety on Twitter | NaturalSociety on Facebook

A Must Read For Women

My friend, Andrea Donsky, that has the website www.naturalsavvy.com, wrote an incredible article that is extremely relevant to all women that have a monthly cycle. She has given me permission to submit it here. As you read the article and become upset there is a link to go to to sign a petition. It is probably one of the most important petitions you will ever sign. The link is: http://chn.ge/10hDR2w. It will be repeated.
Her article is entitled: “Conventional Feminine Hygiene Products: A Women’s Issue With Toxic Implications.”
“I’m a vigilant label reader and have been since I first began to uncover the toxic additives that make seemingly healthy food, junk food. The same is true of the supplements I take and the cosmetic products I put on my body. I’ve learned to look for dangerous chemicals disguised in harmless words like “fragrance” or “made with natural ingredients.” But it wasn’t until researching my new book Label Lessons: Your guide to a Healthy Shopping Cart (with co-author Lisa Tsakos), that I learned firsthand how tampons and sanitary pads, products that alleviate some of the confines of our monthly cycle, might actually be harming our bodies.
Here’s what I found out:
• Conventional tampons and sanitary pad companies don’t have to fully disclose their ingredients.
• Conventional tampons are typically manufactured using a blend of synthetic rayon and cotton
because it’s cheaper to produce than cotton alone and it has a higher capacity for absorbing liquid.
Rayon is a cellulose fiber made from wood pulp. It has been associated with Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS), a synthetic, and potentially deadly, illness caused by bacteria associated with the use of tampons. According to the Mayo Clinic:
“Researchers don’t know exactly how tampons may cause toxic shock syndrome. Some believe that when superabsorbent tampons are left in place for a long time, the tampons become a breeding ground for bacteria. Others have suggested that the superabsorbent fibers in the tampons can scratch the surface of the vagina, making it possible for bacteria or their toxins to enter the bloodstream.”
• Conventional tampons and sanitary pads are bleached using chlorine dioxide. Although the process
Is technically “chlorine-free”, it produces dioxins as a byproduct released into the environment. In
1998, the EPA outlawed a much more potent dioxin-producing bleaching process, and while the newer process significantly reduces dioxins; some experts believe it doesn’t eliminate them entirely from the end products. According to the EPA, dioxin exposure causes cancer in lab animals and poses a high risk to humans as well.
• Conventional tampons contain pesticides. I’ve long been wary of conventional, non-organic, foods
for fear of pesticide residue. All the while, conventional cotton, the most heavily sprayed crop in existence, is used in the tampons that women use each and every month. Cotton crops make up just 2.4 percent of the world’s land, but each year a whopping $2 billion is spent on pesticides to spray this one crop. If tampons were a fruit or a vegetable, they would most certainly be added to the top of the Dirty Dozen Plus list.
• Tampons and pads with odor neutralizers and other artificial fragrances are nothing short of a
chemical soup laced with artificial colors, polyester, adhesives, polyethylene (PET), polypropylene,
and propylene glycol (PEG), contaminants linked to hormone disruption, cancer, birth defects, dryness, and infertility. We are becoming more aware of the dangers associated with chemicals in everyday products including lotions, shampoos, shower curtains, household cleaners, etc. but we need to stop and think about the tampons and sanitary pads we put into and onto our bodies every single month.
• While doing our research, we found very little information on this topic. We really had to dig deep.
* In 2003, House Representative Carolyn Maloney introduced legislation that would have required
research into the health risks posed by additives found in feminine hygiene products. The suspected
risks included endometriosis, cervical cancer, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer. This legislation
didn’t pass. We recently called Carolyn Maloney’s office to inquire whether any new legislation has
been put forth since 2003 and they confirmed nothing has. It’s been over 10 years since concern
arose that the chemicals in tampons and pads could potentially harm women’s reproductive organs.
So why wouldn’t legislation to research the issue be brought back to the table over and over again
Until something is done about it?
• Many conventional sanitary pads include latex, a potential allergen. Latex can be used to make the
Wings on pads more flexible, and it can be used as a binder on the surface of pads and liners, where
It comes in close contact with the skin.
• Ninety percent of conventional sanitary pads are made from crude oil plastic. The rest is made from
chlorine-bleached wood pulp. By using plastic laden feminine hygiene products, we add the
equivalent to 180 billion plastic bags to our waste system.
• Conventional tampons most probably contain genetically modified organisms (GMOs). According to
the USDA, 94 percent of all the cotton planted in the U.S. is genetically engineered. GMOs have been linked to a host of health issues including food allergies, leaky gut syndrome, and inflammation, just to name a few.
If you haven’t yet seen the GMO documentary film Genetic Roulette, I highly recommend it. I had the chance to hear the film’s director, Jeffrey Smith speak in April and he showed that the evidence linking GMOs to health issues is something we can no longer ignore.
Inserting a GMO tampon into your vagina several times every month is no different than ingesting GMO food. In fact, it may even be worse. According to Dr. Susan Treiser, MD. the skin around the vaginal area is highly vascular and therefore more permeable to a wide range of compounds. I am not a doctor or scientist, but logic suggests that GMOs, pesticides or chemicals in the body – from either end – can’t be good for us.
Pick up a box of conventional sanitary pads and try to read the ingredients. You can’t because they aren’t listed. Why, you ask? Because sanitary pads are considered to be “medical device” and because they aren’t inserted into our body, the ingredients don’t have to be listed on the label or disclosed by the company. Many brands of tampons do list some of the ingredients on their package, but full disclosure isn’t mandatory. According to the FDA, proprietary ingredients and formulas are legally protected and do not have to be disclosed by companies.
Since when is a tampon or pad a “medical device?” I was curious what the definition of a “medical device” was so I looked it up.
According to the FDA, a “medical device” is:
“An instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent, or other similar
or related article, including a component part, or accessory, which is:
• Recognized in the official national Formulary, or the United States Pharmacopoeia, or any
Supplement to them.
• Intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation,
Treatment, or prevention of disease, in man or other animals, or
• Intended to affect the structure or any function on the body of man or other animals, and which
Does not achieve its primary intended purposes through chemical action within or on the body
of man or other animals and which is not dependent upon being metabolized for the
achievement of any of its primary intended purposes.”
Since when are tampons and pads used to diagnose, prevent, or treat disease? Is a women’s menstrual cycle considered a disease?
What’s worse – even if ingredients were listed, generally modified ingredients wouldn’t be, because in the United States and Canada, unlike most industrialized nations, they don’t have to be.
This toxic mess has flown under the radar for so long because companies like Proctor & Gamble are not required to label their products.
Luckily, our extensive research also uncovered safe alternatives.
I spoke to dr. Phillip Tierno, a Clinical Professor of Microbiology and Pathology at NYU Medical Centre, who explained, “100 cotton tampons consistently test under detectable levels for TSS toxins.”
In Label Lessons, we look at Natracare, a line of feminine hygiene products with all the effectiveness and none of the toxins. Since tampon absorbency is regulated by the FDA, all tampons, organic and conventional, must meet strict absorbency guidelines. Natracare uses 100 percent organic cotton so there are no synthetic ingredients and no GMO cotton. And because the company uses hydrogen peroxide to bleach its products, they are also 100 percent dioxin-free. They’re wrapped in chlorine-free paper, the packaging is recycled, and they’re never tested on animals.
Other great safe feminine hygiene alternatives include the Diva Cup, Seventh Generation Chlorine Free Organic Cotton Tampons, Glad Rags Organic Pads, and ORGANYC 100 percent Organic Cotton Tampons.
The Environmental Perspective
In my lifetime, I’ll use 17,000 sanitary care products, so what I use matters, both for myself and for the planet, especially considering all the pesticides that create dead zones in our soil and water systems. And then there’s the crude oil plastic, which makes up 90 percent of conventional sanitary pads and is used in plastic applicator tampons. One conventional sanitary pad, for example, uses the equivalent of four plastic bags. Organic products like Natracare, on the other hand, are plastic free.
As women, not knowing what goes into and onto our bodies every single month sets us back decades. But even still, it’s not just a women’s issue. If you have a wife, daughter, mother, or sister, this issue impacts you as well.
Conventional tampon producers need to disclose what’s in their products; they need to be honest so that women can make safe, informed decisions about what they put in their bodies.
Personally, I use Natracare tampons and pads and have been for more than ten years. I have met Susie Hewson, the founder of the company, on several occasions and I am inspired by her passion and dedication to women’s health and the environment.
We called Proctor & Gamble on many different occasions to ask them to disclose what’s in their Always Infinity Pad. All they could tell us was that it contained foam and a proprietary formula called infinicel (a trademark), a super absorbent material with more than 60 patents. This was a very frustrating experience for us, as well as for P&G’s customer service representatives, because they are kept in the dark about the ingredients as well.
I can’t decide which is worse, the fact that we still don’t know what’s in a product that so many women use every month or that Proctor & Gamble isn’t obligated to tell us what their pads are made of, even when we go out of our way to call them.
Disclosing what’s in the products they make that go in and on women’s bodies should not be optional. It should be mandatory!
We need companies to be accountable for the products they manufacture. We need to know ahead of time how to avoid the rayon, pesticide residue, GMO cotton, dioxins, chemical toxins, petrochemicals, and plastic often found in conventional feminine hygiene products.
We need to have full disclosure labeling on tampons and pads so, as women, we can make informed decisions when it comes to the products we buy.
Please, please, sign the petition – http://chn.ge/10hDR2w.
Join me and the Naturally Savvy team, in putting an end to this breach of public trust by signing our petition to force Proctor & Gamble to tell us what’s in their products.
Thank you,
Andrea Donsky
For a full list of references go to our ebook, Label Lessons: Your Guide to a Healthy Shopping Cart, found at www.naturallysavvy.com
andrea@naturallysavvy.com”
In closing, I would like to say this is just throwing another log on the fire of corruption, deceit, corporations geared to making money at the health expense of the people, and let’s not forget Monsanto’s sponsoring of chemtrails so they can determine if their garbage crops are resistant to the adverse effects of arsenic, barium, strontium, and aluminum dropped on them, with no regard for the effects on the people and their thyroid gland (yes, all those chemicals dropped by the chemtrails affect the thyroid gland) or other crops that these poisons drop on. We live in a world where the only importance is the amount of money in a trick’s pocket that can pay for the products offered for sale, and as you can see from this article the corporations hide behind loopholes to not label ingredients.
What happens when these toxins infiltrate our systems? What happens is that we get sick and visit a hooker (physician) that is clueless as to how to fix the problem other than prescribing a pharmaceutical to merely treat a symptom. If they know that organic sulfur crystals removed heavy metals, toxins, radiation, parasites and more, they still would not advise it because a business flourishes by repeat business not by a cure.
And the motto of the pimps and hookers? In God we trust. All others pay cash.
Aloha!
P.S. Just recently, I was contacted by a woman that developed a vaginal fungus. The cause that we could determine was the Monsanto GMO cotton tampons that most of that industry uses. I told her that the sulfur crystals would fix the problem. On faith, she ordered them. Ten days later the old skin was dying off and new skin was regenerating. What also sped up the process was that several months ago she switched to a vegan diet, gave up sugar, salt, and processed foods and the crystals just increased the detoxification and the healing.
About Hesh:
I have been doing a weekly radio show in Honolulu since 1981 called “Health Talk”.
In 2007 I was “forced” to get a Masters degree in Nutrition because of all the doctors that would call in asking for my credentials. They do not call in anymore.
Going to www.healthtalkhawaii.com enables you, among other things, to listen to the shows. I am an activist. In addition, I espouse an organic vegan diet for optimum health.
I am strongly opposed to GMOs, vaccines, processed foods, MSG, aspartame, fluoridation and everything else that the pimps (Big pHarma, Monsanto and the large food companies) and the hookers (the doctors, the government agencies, the public health officials, and the mainstream media) thrust upon us, the tricks.
After being vaccinated with the DTP vaccine as a child I developed asthma. After taking the organic sulfur crystals (they are harvested from the pine trees in Louisiana) in November of 2008 for 3 days my asthma reversed and has not come back in 5 years.
Twenty two cases, so far, of autism have been reversed, as has cancer, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, osteoarthritis, joint pain, astigmatism, and gum disease. There are many cases of increased sexual activity, heavy metal and radiation elimination, parasite elimination, free radicals elimination, faster athletic recovery time, increased blood circulation, reduced inflammation, resistance to getting the flu, reduction of wrinkles, allergy reduction, reduced PMS and monthly period pain, nausea, migraines, erectile dysfunction, and so much more. And it’s only possible because of the oxygen the sulfur crystals release that floods the cells of the body.
The sulfur, as proven by the University of Southampton in England, enables the body to produce vitamin B12 and the essential amino acids.
You can find out more about this incredible nutrient also on my website – www.healthtalkhawaii.com -.
My book, “A Sane Diet For An Insane World”, which has been published. and can be viewed at www.asanediet.com., will explain simply why what you eat, for the most part, is designed to keep you in a state of declining health.
HESH GOLDSTEIN, MSNUTRI
“Health Talk” Moderator, K-108 Radio
P.O. Box 240783
Honolulu, Hawaii 96824-0783
(808) 258-1177
www.healthtalkhawaii.com
www.asanediet.com
heshgoldstein@gmail.com

How the vaccine industry keeps itself "immune" from the Constitution

(NaturalNews) Vaccinations are created to help people develop immunity to disease, right?

So why are more and more families reaching out and saying that vaccines are giving their children neurological damage and autism?

While investigating the vaccine industry, one might ask, "Are vaccines really keeping people immune from diseases, or are they actually inducing neurological damages by injecting heavy metals and other questionable ingredients into people's bloodstream?"

And why are health risks ignored, unlabeled and not reported on?

Where is the accountability?

Who is really immune - those who consume vaccines, or the vaccine industry?

The answer:

Vaccine manufacturers themselves are the ones granted immunity, and it started in 1986 with the passage of the Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.

It's time to take a closer look.

Justice destroyed - vaccine industry granted immunity through the Childhood Vaccine Injury Act

In 1986, Congress passed a bill called the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. On the surface, this act looks judicial and compassionate - reaching out to injured families. What it really does though is circumvent the Constitution, denying injured parties the right to a trial by jury.

In fact, this federal act allows vaccine manufacturers the "right" to not disclose known risks of their vaccinations. Based on the "learned intermediary doctrine," manufacturers of vaccines are immune from liability and don't have to report accurate information to those being vaccinated.

According to this system, a family injured by a vaccine cannot sue the vaccine maker. Instead, the family must adhere to a specified federal claims court. This "vaccine court" shields the vaccine manufacturers from true judicial accountability, compensating victims by paying them off.

This vaccine injury compensation program insulates vaccine manufacturers from liability, allowing them to keep operations steady, with affordable vaccine prices and a stable vaccine supply.

This crony protection endorses bad medicine and keeps real immune system-boosting answers from ever entering the marketplace. It keeps people in the dark about vaccination dangers and spits right in the face of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness in the United States of America.

This is why vaccines are scheduled to children en masse today and are practically mandated. The list of vaccines given to children on the vaccine schedule has tripled in the last three decades!

The whole circumventing process has basically bailed out the vaccine industry, allowing them to run free and have no consequences for harming other people's lives.

Injured families are restricted from bringing vaccine manufacturer before a jury of their peers, so they must instead submit to the Department of Health and Human Services. The federal government then determines whether or not the family should be paid off to basically keep quiet.

But victims are not keeping quiet, and groups like the Canary Party are raising awareness of this deceitful "vaccine court" system.

Vaccine manufacturers bypassing due process of law as autism cases are dismissed

The Department of Health and Human services website states:

"HHS has never concluded in any case that autism was caused by vaccination."

But after reviewing "compensated cases of vaccine induced brain injury," there have been approximately 2,500 cases of vaccine injury privately compensated since 1986, and at least 83 of those cases were autism compensation cases.

On top of that, since 2002, nearly 5,000 families have filed petitions with the VICP claiming that vaccines had caused their children's autism.

But instead of holding manufacturers accountable, the VICP created and conducted the Omnibus Autism Proceeding. In 2010, all of these people's voices were drowned out, and their cases were consolidated into one case. The case was ultimately deemed a "test case" claim of vaccine-induced autism. Instead of receiving a trial by jury, each family was dismissed and disgraced.

So do families have the right to a civil court? 


Do they have a right to bring vaccine manufacturers before a jury of their peers?

Many believe this is their right under the Constitution of the United States.



Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/043261_vaccine_industry_legal_immunity_US_Constitution.html#ixzz2nkbXUxM9

Smoking plastic, pesticide, bleach and fiberglass - The four killers that Big Tobacco never mentions

(NaturalNews) Have you ever wondered why cigarettes don't go out in heavy wind and why they burn so evenly, all the way from one end to the other? Could it be that plastic particles are woven into the rolling paper to make your nicotine delivery device more efficient? Cellulose acetate is a form of plastic that's commonly used for photo film and is highly flammable. It's time to investigate what smoking plastic does to your heart, brain and central nervous system, and it's time to understand a vicious cycle that can be broken with the right behavior modification and nutrition.
(http://www.naturalnews.com)

Have you ever thought that maybe nicotine is just relief for the uneasy nervous feelings you get from smoking bug and weed killer - pesticide? Since most tobacco is treated with herbicides and pesticides, including genetically modified tobacco that contains herbicide in its genetic makeup, cigarette addicts are addicted to poison, and it gives them a "cigarette hangover" from which they look to juiced-up nicotine for immediate relief - hence, the chain smokers of the world. Big Tobacco knows this.
(http://www.naturalnews.com)

Many people eat white foods that are not naturally white but rather bleached white, like white sugar, white pasta, white flour and white bread, even most white rice. Yet, how many smokers realize that they are smoking bleach? It's true. Cigarette paper comes from trees that are naturally brown, so every puff of smoke contains a little bleach. Consuming bleach on a regular basis, whether by food or by inhaling fumes, causes cancer of the lungs, the bladder, the pancreas, the liver and other cleansing organs that are vital to life. Filter bleach from your daily intake starting right now.
(http://www.sustainablebabysteps.com)

Fiberglass insulation is what insulates most attics and keeps them warm in the winter and cool in the summer. It's made by grouping millions of tiny glass fibers, which are tiny rods of glass nearly too small to see individually, like glass wool. There is a reason why cigarette filters (butts) take up to fifteen years to disintegrate. They are made of glass wool, and that is why a smoker's fingers and/or thumb stay cool, even when they smoke the cigarette right down to the nub/filter. When these tiny "shards of glass" escape into the mouth, throat, esophagus and lungs, they rip apart the epithelial tissue, the soft tissue lining the inside of those parts of the body. This creates damage not only on the surface but on the cellular level. Then the chemicals creep into the wounds, and that leads to cancer. When viewing X-rays of people exposed to asbestos or fiberglass, and even smokers lungs, ground glass opacity (glass fibers sitting in lungs) looks as if someone breathed in glass fibers and a pile of them are just sitting at the bottom of the lungs, like ground glass in a busted light bulb. Can this be filtered out of the lungs, ever? Can a person detoxify themselves from ground glass "syndrome"?
(http://www.naturalnews.com)

More cancer-causing chemicals in tobacco smoke:
• Tar - a mixture of dangerous chemicals
• Arsenic - used in wood preservatives
• Acrolein - formerly used as a chemical weapon
• Benzene - an industrial solvent, refined from crude oil
• Cadmium - used in batteries
• Chromium - used to manufacture dye, paints and alloys
• Formaldehyde - used in mortuaries and paint manufacturing
• Nitrosamines - a group of DNA-damaging chemicals
• Polonium-210 - a highly radioactive element
• Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons - dangerous DNA-damaging chemicals
• 1,3-Butadiene - used in rubber manufacturing
(http://www.cancerresearchuk.org)

Knowledge is Power

One thing about knowledge is that, once you have it, it's yours for life. You can't lend it out and forget to get it back. You can't 'misplace' it. Nobody can steal it from you either. Plus, once you have knowledge, you can act on it with confidence, especially when that knowledge fosters your livelihood and your good health. Shove all the negativity to one side and move forward from here. Never put known carcinogens (toxins) in your body. There is a way out, and it doesn't involve one single chemical. There is an "organic" way out of your chemical "entanglement." (http://www.14andout.com)

14AndOut!, the all natural method to quit smoking in 14 days, incorporates this chemical knowledge with behavior modification AND nutrition. Your body is ready for a change, a permanent change, over to organic living. You can detoxify yourself of the four big killers that have been hiding in cigarettes, keeping you from reaching your potential in life. Now is the time. Make the resolution for good health and prosperity.
(http://premium.naturalnews.tv)

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/043263_Big_Tobacco_cigarettes_toxic_chemicals.html#ixzz2nkauctmS

California's New Vaccine Exemption Law- Above The Law?

(NaturalNews) California's AB 2109 was passed into law in 2012 and takes effect January 1, 2014. The new CA law (http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov) will require parents exercising an exemption to immunizations to provide a letter or affidavit to document which required immunizations have been given and which have not been given on the basis that they are contrary to the parent's beliefs; and beginning on January 1, 2014, the letter or affidavit has to be accompanied by a State Department of Public Health form signed by a health care practitioner saying that he or she provided the parent "information regarding the benefits and risks of the immunization and the health risks of specified communicable diseases," and a written statement by the parent indicating that he or she received the information from the health care practitioner. (Seriously? the doctor's signature alone is not convincing?) California's Governor Brown, when signing AB 2109 into law, directed the Department of Public Health to allow for a separate religious exemption on the form, so that people whose religious beliefs are opposed vaccinations won't be required to seek a health care practitioner's signature. The Department complied, and included a religious exemption in its form.

This article addresses the Constitutionality of: 1) the new law, 2) the Governor's authority to direct the Health Department to allow for a separate religious exemption on the form, 3) the Constitutionality of the current version of the Health Department's proposed form, and 4) what can be done about these Constitutional problems.

I.Is the new law Constitutional?

While state legislators each take an oath to uphold the state and federal Constitutions, that oath really means little to nothing, as laws are not officially unconstitutional unless and until a court says so. That is, in practice, legislators are free to ignore their oaths and any Constitutional problems in bills; they need only be concerned with getting enough votes and the governor's signature. If they get that, the bill becomes law.

The problem with California's new law concerns those with religious objections to immunizations. While what specific beliefs qualify for a religious exemption is beyond the scope of an article, the starting place is that the "free exercise" clause of the First Amendment as interpreted by federal courts provides protection for any belief that is religious in nature and sincerely held. If you meet those two criteria as the law defines them, you qualify for any exemption that includes religious objections. And since the Constitution is a higher legal authority than state law, states cannot add additional requirements.

California's new law refers only to "beliefs" - it says nothing about religion or religious objections. Does California's new exemption law include those with religious objections to vaccines? Technically, that depends on California's statutory construction rules, which explain how to interpret California's statutes. In California, like most if not all other states, statutes must be interpreted to give the intent of the legislature, and unambiguous laws are deemed to state the intent of the legislature. So, California's exemption law does, implicitly and per applicable statutory construction rules, include a religious exemption. The state Department of Public Health has acknowledged this with respect to California's current exemption law; see, e.g.,http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/immunize/Documents/imm488e.pdf.

The Constitutional problem with the new statute comes from the fact that it requires *all* persons claiming an exemption, including those with religious beliefs, to jump through additional hoops, which places an unconstitutional burden on those with religious objections, who need only have a sincerely held religious belief under the Constitution. Therefore, the new law is unconstitutional as to those parents with qualifying religious objections to immunizations.

Governor Brown seemed to be acknowledging this when he directed the Department of Public Health to provide for a separate religious exemption on the health department form, so kudos for Governor Brown. But did he have authority to do this?

II.The Governor's Authority to Direct the Health Department...

Under general principals of separation of powers, the three branches of government - executive (which at the state level is the governor's office), legislative and judiciary - provide checks and balances for one another. No branch has direct control over any other branch. So, the governor probably could not legally require the health department, which was created by the legislature and is therefore a part of the legislative branch, to do anything. However, the health department may, as a function of its discretionary authority, choose to cooperate with the governor and attempt to implement his directive, so long as the department does so within the boundaries of its statutory authority. So while the governor may have exceeded his authority to direct the health department to include a religious exemption, the health department may have authority to cooperate with the governor by adding a religious exemption to its proposed form, which it has in fact done. However, did the health department follow the law in its attempt to appease the governor?

III. The Department of Public Health's New Vaccine Exemption Form (http://eziz.org/assets/docs/CDPH-8262.pdf)

The good news is that the health department's new exemption form provides a separate religious exemption - parents with religious objections don't have to get a lecture about vaccines or a doctor's signature. The bad news is that the wording on the new form appears to require membership in an organized religion with tenets opposed to immunizations, which is unconstitutional. As stated above, the First Amendment, a higher legal authority than state law, requires only a sincerely held religious belief.

In summary, the California State Legislature passed an unconstitutional exemption law; Governor Brown probably exceeded his authority when issuing a directive to the California Department of Public Health telling it to include a religious exemption in the exemption form, and the California Department of Public Health has created an unconstitutional exemption form. Does anyone besides me see a pattern here? I'll let you decide whether this is incompetence or politics, but these errors have resulted in a bad law that will probably unlawfully discriminate against some California parents.

What Can California Parents Do?

The simplest short-term solution would be for the Department of Public Health to modify their form to bring it into compliance with the Constitution - to remove the "member" requirement and require only a sincerely held religious belief or practice opposed to immunizations. The long-term solution would be for the legislature to correct this by amending the state statute. Citizens in California should contact their representatives and the state health department to demand this. Go in numbers if possible, with a petition or group; and see your state representative in person if at all possible; letters and emails tend to get little or no real attention.

Parents adversely affected by the new law could also file a lawsuit challenging the Constitutionality of the law. However, there's a risk there. When others states' unconstitutional religious exemption laws were ruled to be unconstitutional by a court, the result, most of the time, was that the entire exemption was stricken, leaving the state with no religious exemption option at all until the state legislature enacted a new exemption law. So, this needs to be analyzed carefully by attorneys contemplating such a suit. Meanwhile, with respect to the health department form as currently drafted, parents who qualify for a religious exemption but who don't meet the Department of Public Health's form requirement of "membership" in a religion could theoretically refuse to provide a doctor's signature anyway, since that requirement is arguably unconstitutional. You may need an attorney backing you up to pull that off, but the legal argument is there. If enough parents around the state objected in this manner, perhaps the legislature would be forced to pay attention to proper legal boundaries for a change, and would amend the statute to bring it into compliance with the Constitution.

--------------

Alan Phillips, J.D. is a nationally recognized vaccine rights attorney. He advises clients, activists and other attorneys throughout the U.S. in over a dozen different vaccine exemption and waiver contexts, and supports activists nationally with vaccine legislative initiatives. Learn more at www.vaccinerights.com

About the author:
Alan Phillips, Vaccine Rights Attorney
attorney@vaccinerights.com, 1-828-575-2622
Vaccine Rights (www.vaccinerights.com)

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/043266_California_vaccine_exemptions_Constitutional_rights.html#ixzz2nka31pda

Sunday, December 15, 2013

Recipe of the day-Homemade Vegan Chocolate Honeycomb Candy

I used to love getting these during Christmas time, used to be one of my favorite candies. So I was super excited when I found this recipe. It doesn't seem to complicated either.
Recipe is from Forkandbeans.com she has some great recipes to check out.


Ingredients
  1. 1/3 c. vegan butter
  2. 1/3 c. light corn syrup
  3. 2/3 c. vegan sugar (I like Zulka sugar)
  4. 3 Tb. water
  5. 2 1/2 tsp. baking soda (no clumps)
Instructions
  1. In a 8x8 glass pan, line with parchment paper. Set aside.
  2. On medium heat, combine all of the ingredients together except for the baking soda in a deep saucepan (keep in mind that when you eventually mix it in, the baking soda will make the recipe explode like lava--this is why you want a deep pot). Be sure to stir continuously.
  3. Once the sugar dissolves, turn heat up to medium-high heat until the mixture begins to boil. Do not stir at this point. Allow to boil for 5-7 minutes. It will be tempting to walk away but don't! After the 5 minute mark, the candy's temp will spike and you will burn it if you do not keep an eye on it.
  4. Once the mixture becomes a golden caramel color, immediately whisk in the baking soda until completely mixed in. Watch the science experiment begin!
  5. Place into the parchment paper-lined pan and allow to cool down and set for 30 minutes. Do not touch! Those air pockets are imperative for the texture in this candy.
  6. Break with a knife once it sets and coat with melted chocolate if you desire.

Friday, December 13, 2013

"Good" Gut Bacteria Carried Through Breastmilk, Benefits Baby

By: Elizabeth Renter


With the influx of research and information showing how breastfeeding is essential for a baby’s growth and well-being, it’s not a surprise to see that U.S. breastfeeding rates have been on a steady climb for the past several years. So, is another study on the benefits of breastfeeding really necessary? Well, yes. The new research comes to us from researchers in Switzerland. Scientists found that healthy bacteria, which is crucial for digestive health and immune function, can actually travel from a mother’s digestive system into her breast milk where it nurtures the digestion and immune activity of her child.
Many women, especially young and poor mothers, are misled about the benefits of formula feeding. Around the world formula is seen almost as a status symbol to the detriment of infant health. So, new research showing that mother’s milk can give babies a digestive edge is important.
“We are excited to find out that bacteria can actually travel from the mother’s gut to her breast milk,” said lead researcher Professor Christophe Lacroix. “A healthy community of bacteria in the gut of both mother and baby is really important for baby’s gut health and immune system development. “

For the study, published in Environmental Microbiology, scientists tested the DNA of mothers’ breast milk and their exclusively breast-fed one month old babies. They also tested fecal samples of both children and their mothers. The researchers discovered identical strains of the microbe Bifidobacterium breve and “several types of ‘good’ Clostridium” in both babies and the breast milk.”
“This study shows that gut-associated anaerobes may be vertically transferred from mother to neonate (infant) via breastfeeding. Our data supports the recently suggested hypothesis of a novel way of mother-neonate communication, in which maternal gut bacteria reach breast milk via an entero-mammary pathway to influence neonatal gut colonization and maturation of the immune system.”
The role of healthy gut bacteria in people of all ages has been increasingly explored in the scientific world. An unhealthy balance of gut bacteria has been linked to everything from mental illness, obesity, and even autism.
In the decade from 2000 to 2010, rates have jumped a whopping 14%—from 35% to 49% in babies six months of age. Approximately 77% of U.S. newborns are breastfed, and 27% are still being fed breast milk at 12 months of age. For breastfeeding mothers, the research means keeping your digestive system in check while nursing is of utmost important. Eat foods that encourage and even replenish gut bacteria like fermented foods. Also avoid antibiotics (which destroy all bacteria) whenever possible.




Monday, December 9, 2013

Recipe of the day-Vegan Banana Bread

  I made this the other day and it turned out super good! Definitely recommend this recipe!


by IsaChandra

Makes 12 slices
A simple, no frills banana bread. Perfect for, um, eating. I recently edited the amount of sugar needed, so this should be perfect now.
Ingredients
1/2 cup brown sugar
1/2 cups white sugar
1/2 cup margarine, at room temp
3 very ripe bananas, mashed well
2 cups flour
1/2 teaspoon baking soda
1/4 cup vanilla soy milk, mixed with 1 teaspoon apple cider vinegar
1 teaspoon vanilla
1 teaspoon cinnamon
1/4 teaspoon allspice
1/2 teaspoon salt
Directions
Preheat oven to 350 F. Spray a 8×4 bread pan with non stick cooking spray, or lightly coat with margarine.
Sift together flour, baking soda, salt and spices.
Cream together the margarine and sugars. Add bananas, soy milk and vanilla.
Add the wet ingredients to the dry. Mix well. Pour batter into pan. Bake for an hour to an hour 10 minutes.

I substituted the margarine for earth balance vegan butter. 

Saturday, December 7, 2013

Make Your Own Shampoo with Essential Oils

"Naturally Healthy Hair," from author Mary Beth Jansenn, offers readers recipes to make their own natural shampoo.


Acclaimed hair designer and educator Mary Beth Janssen aims to help readers achieve harmony in both mind and body with Naturally Healthy Hair (Storey Publishing, 1999). Jansenn has long been a voice for the integration of health and beauty, and many of her recipes call for the uses of organic ingredients and forgotten knowledge. This Pure Shampoo Recipe With Essential Oils, excerpted from Chapter 6, is a great way to make your own natural shampoo.
You can purchase this book from the MOTHER EARTH NEWS store: Naturally Healthy Hair.

Pure Shampoo Recipe With Essential Oils

The ingredients for this recipe are chosen for their desirable aromatic as well as therapeutic values. Some of my favorite formulations for specific conditions are outlined below. I encourage you to experiment with the herbs, essential oils, and other ingredients I’ve discussed so far, though, because the possible variations are tremendous.
Makes 8-10 ounces (235-295 ml)
Ingredients:
1–2 tablespoons (15–30 ml) dried herbs of your choice8 ounces (235 ml) purified water2 ounces (60 ml) liquid castile or glycerin soap1 teaspoon (5 ml) base oil of your choice (eliminate or reduce for oily conditions; increase for dry)15–60  drops essential oils of your choice, as conditions require
Instructions:
1. Create a decoction or infusion of your desired herb or combinations of herbs. Remember that a decoction is used for roots, stems, and seeds, or more fibrous, tough plants, while infusions are used for more delicate plant parts, including leaves and flowers. If you are combining herbs that need different treatments, decoct and infuse them separately, then mix the herbalized liquids.
For a decoction, place the herbs in water in a stainless-steel or glass pan. Bring to a boil, reduce the heat, and simmer on low for up to 10 minutes. Remove from the heat, let the mixture cool, strain off the liquid, and discard the spent herbs.
For an infusion, bring the water to a boil. Place the herbs in a stainless-steel or glass pan and pour the boiling water over them. Let steep for at least 20 minutes, then let the mixture cool (if it isn’t cool already), strain off the liquid, and discard the spent herbs.
Tip: To increase the potency of the formula, let the herbs steep in the cooled liquid in an airtight container for a couple of days before straining and using.
2. Mix the herbal infusion or decoction with the soap, base oil, and desired essential oils. Shake well. Refrigerate the shampoo between uses, for up to a week, then discard.
Adding 1 teaspoon (5 ml) of vodka to this mixture will add 2 to 3 weeks to its shelf life, as will adding 1 teaspoon (5 ml) of either vitamin E or wheat germ oil.
To Use:
Shake well before each use.
Additives: You can also add ingredients with properties suitable for your particular hair condition, such as apple juice, honey, egg, aloe vera, gelatin, glycerin, or lecithin. Use 1 tablespoon (15 ml) per shampoo formula.


Read more: http://www.motherearthnews.com/natural-health/shampoo-essential-oils-ze0z1312zjhar.aspx#ixzz2mqVTsvUO

Lavender Oil Improves Migraine Symptoms by 74%

by 


The scent of lavender is a favorite in the beauty industry—used in bath and body products and marketed as a soothing smell with a spa-like quality. But this isn’t some marketing gimmick; lavender scent truly does relax and soothe the body. Lavender essential oil has a variety of beneficial effects in addition to its relaxing qualities. One of these, recently affirmed by Iranian researchers, is in the treatment of migraines.
Migraines are intense headaches that aren’t usually relieved with traditional methods. They are usually accompanied by nausea, sensitivity to lights and sounds, vomiting, and vision anomalies. They are more common in women than men, and affect around 37 million Americans.
Researchers with Mashhad University of Medical Science Department of Neurology divided 47 participants into two groups. One group received lavender essential oil which they were instructed to inhale for about 15 minutes. The control group received paraffin to inhale for the same amount of time. Then, participants recorded their headache symptoms and severity in 30 minute intervals for a two hour period.
In the lavender group, there was a 74% improvement in the severity of symptoms. Also, there were fewer migraines over the course of the study when compared with the control group.
These results are particularly remarkable when you compare the lavender oil effectiveness rate with the rates of effectiveness for other conventional migraine treatments. The study concluded:
“The present study suggests that inhalation of lavender essential oil may be an effective and safe treatment modality in acute management of migraine headaches.”
As reported by Paul Fassa for Natural News, high doses of Tylenol (acetaminophen) only helps migraine sufferers about 50% of the time. Ibuprofen is slightly more effective, with improvement in 57% of cases, while the number one prescribed migraine medication, Imitrex, is effective 59% of the time. Lavender oil seems to rival the effectiveness rate of all of these options and without the side effects.
In addition to migraine treatment, lavender oil is antifungal, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory. It’s great to use topically on bug bites and rashes and can be inhaled for anxiety or insomnia.